|Title||The Tokyo Judgment and the Rape of Nanking|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2001|
|Journal||The Journal of Asian Studies|
|Keywords||AREA STUDIES, History, International law, Trials, World War II|
Brooks examines Radhabinod Pal’s dissent from the majority judgment at the Tokyo Tribunal following WWII. Pal’s contribution to international law was the assertion that unilateral justice is an inadequate base for applying international law.