Hesitating before the Judgment of History
| Title | Hesitating before the Judgment of History |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2012 |
| Authors | Brook, T |
| Journal | The Journal of Asian Studies |
| Volume | 71 |
| Pagination | 103 |
| ISBN Number | 0021-9118 |
| Keywords | Military history, War |
| Abstract | The ubiquitous experience of wartime collaboration in East Asia has not yet undergone the analysis that its counterpart in Europe has received. The difficulty has to do with the political legacies that the denunciation of collaboration legitimized, as well as the continuing hegemony of the discourse of nationalism. Both inhibitors encourage the condemnation of collaboration rather than its historicization. Reflecting briefly on the 1946 trial of Liang Hongzhi, China's first head of state under the Japanese, this essay argues that the historian's task is not to create moral knowledge, but to probe the presuppositions that bring the moral subject of the collaborator into being for us, and then ask whether real collaborators correspond to this moral subject. In the face of the natural impulse to render judgment, this essay argues for the wisdom of hesitation. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
- Login to post comments
- Home
- About the Department
- People
- Courses
- Research Clusters
- Thematic Clusters
- Communities
- Culture/Power/History
- Environmental History
- Ethnicity, Race, and Nationalism
- First Nations, Aboriginal, and Indigenous History
- Gender, Sexuality, and the Body
- Global History, Maritime History, and the History of Empire
- History of Children and Youth
- History of Religion
- International Relations
- Law and Society
- Migration, Borderlands, and Transnational History
- Politics, Political Culture, and State Power
- Science, Technology, and Medicine
- Undergraduate
- Graduate
- Writing Centre










